data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b047/9b04783c2d7421d77bf1d3a78689240b4b965630" alt=""
The candidate for the first historical novel may be debatable.
However, the case for the first popular English historical novelist is a little tighter.
Sir Walter Scott began a trend for the historical novel with
Waverley (published 1814), and most enduringly with
Ivanhoe (1819).
His predecessor Daniel Defoe makes a good case for himself, of course, with novels such as Roxana and Journal of the Plague Year. Yet the eighteenth century novel can be a difficult beast with its often peripatetic plots, frank to the point of lewdness yet curiously impersonal. Most people, excepting serious students of English, are now trained to read in the style developed by the Romantics. And that, in fact, is one of the reasons for Scott’s success, that he combined Romanticism with his fascination for legends and antiquities. In his day, he was said to be the most widely read novelist in the world, and his influence on the genre of historical fiction was global, reaching writers of historical fiction from France (Alexandre Dumas) and Russia (Aleksandr Pushkin) to America (James Fenimore Cooper).
But at its heart, Ivanhoe is just a ripping good yarn. Scott wrote at an impressive pace, churning out two novels a year, plus other writings, seldom stopping to edit himself (careful readers will catch inconsistencies of detail). His characters are painted in broad, stereotypical brushstrokes, part of a style that he himself described as “the Big Bow-wow strain.” Yet this is why they stick in our mind: the blond Saxon princess pitted against the beautiful dark-haired Jewess for Ivanhoe’s affections; the true knight who faces the corrupted crusader; Robin Hood and his men, as merry as you could wish.
Scott’s very shortcomings become his triumph. He was a pen and ink man, churning out historical novels to support the upkeep of his own piece of history, the estate of Abbotsford. And whatever critics feel about the quality of some of his work, his efforts almost singlehandedly rehabilitated the reputation and pride of a Scotland still suffering from the consequences of the failed Jacobite rebellions. In light of his passion for and influence on the genre, it is perhaps ironic that few of his novels are read today.
One final reason that I really like
Ivanhoe is the teacher in me.
The story manages to capture the imagination of students, and those ‘broad strokes’ I mentioned above help them to feel confident as they practice skills of analysis.
In fact (and this whole post really wasn’t a plug!) I wrote a curriculum guide for the
Center for Learning that pairs Ivanhoe and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, exploring among other things themes of chivalry and the influence of the medieval romance on the modern novel.
Scott’s most popular novels (today) include Ivanhoe, Rob Roy and Kenilworth; further reading on Scott’s life and writings include Sir Walter Scott by John Lauber (Twayne 1989) and Sir Walter Scott: Wizard of the North by Pearle Henriksen Schultz (Vanguard 1969).
(By the way, if you are interested in the origins and influence of other historical novelists, you might check out the blog of the
Ron Empress, whose work has been inspired by the fourteenth century Chinese
Romance of the Three Kingdoms.)